From 6cf7e81c56522f4b025c933f342f11d247d4df47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Duncan <duncan@saduk.inc>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:13:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Meeting needs of submission

---
 trackingPaper.tex | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/trackingPaper.tex b/trackingPaper.tex
index 7a38f78..028ebcc 100644
--- a/trackingPaper.tex
+++ b/trackingPaper.tex
@@ -117,11 +117,12 @@
 % can use linebreaks \\ within to get better formatting as desired
 \title{A Trace-Based Study of SMB Network File System Workloads in an Academic Enterprise}
 
-%\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Paul Wortman and John Chandy}
-%\IEEEauthorblockA{Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering\\
-%University of Connecticut, USA\\
-%(paul.wortman, john.chandy)@uconn.edu
-%}}
+\author{\IEEEauthorblockN{Paul Wortman and John Chandy}
+\IEEEauthorblockA{Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering\\
+University of Connecticut, USA\\
+(paul.wortman, john.chandy)@uconn.edu
+\\
++1-860-486-5047/+1-860-486-2447}}
 
 
 % make the title area
@@ -136,8 +137,8 @@ We further investigate if the recent standard models for traffic remain accurate
 Our findings reveal interesting data relating to the number of read and write events.  We notice that the number of read and write events is significantly less than creates and the average number of bytes exchanged per I/O is much smaller than what has been seen in previous studies. 
 %the average of bytes transferred over the wire is much smaller than what has been seen in previous studies.  
 Furthermore we find an increase in the use of metadata for overall network communication that can be taken advantage of through the use of smart storage devices.
-\keywords{Server Message Block, 
-Network Benchmark, Storage Systems, Distributed I/O, Network Communication Analysis.}
+\keywords{Server Message Block, Storage System Tracing,
+Network Benchmark, Storage Systems, Distributed I/O.}
 \end{abstract}
 
 \section{Introduction}
@@ -288,6 +289,7 @@ The SMB 1.0 protocol~\cite{SMB1Spec} has been found to have high/significant imp
 	\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{./images/packetcapturetopology.png}
 	\caption{Visualization of Packet Capturing System}
 	\label{fig:captureTopology}
+	\vspace{-1em}
 \end{figure*}
 
 
@@ -445,6 +447,7 @@ Combine Protocol Operations	&	2,421,214	&	278,998,472	&	281,419,686	\\
 Combined Protocols \% & 0.86\% & 99.14\%	&	100\% \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \caption{\label{tbl:SMBCommands}Percentage of SMB and SMB2 Protocol Commands on March 15th}
+\vspace{-1em}
 \end{table} 
 
 \begin{table}[]
@@ -543,6 +546,7 @@ running scripts creating a large volume of files. A more significant reason was
 	\vspace{-2em}
 	\caption{PDF and CDF of Bytes Transferred for Read and Write I/O}
 	\label{fig:SMB-Bytes-IO}
+	\vspace{-1em}
 \end{figure}
 
 %\begin{figure}
@@ -661,7 +665,7 @@ We also observe that the number of writes is very close to the number of reads.
 	\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{./images/smb_2019_iats_pdf.png}
 	\caption{PDF of Inter-Arrival Time for SMB I/O}
 	\label{fig:PDF-IAT-SMB}
-	%\vspace{-2em}
+	\vspace{-1em}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{figure}[t!]
@@ -675,7 +679,7 @@ We also observe that the number of writes is very close to the number of reads.
 	\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{./images/smb_2019_rts_pdf.png}
 	\caption{PDF of Response Time for SMB I/O}
 	\label{fig:PDF-RT-SMB}
-	%\vspace{-2em}
+	\vspace{-1em}
 \end{figure}
 
 \begin{table}[]
@@ -934,6 +938,7 @@ h & 2,019,714 & 0.92 \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \caption{Top 10 File Extensions Seen Over Three Week Period}
 \label{tab:top10SMB2FileExts}
+\vspace{-2em}
 \end{table}
 
 \begin{table}[]
@@ -954,6 +959,7 @@ txt & 167,827 & 0.08 \\ \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \caption{Common File Extensions Seen Over Three Week Period}
 \label{tab:commonSMB2FileExts}
+\vspace{-3em}
 \end{table}
 
 %Points worth mentioning: