You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Beautiful code, however the only concern that I have is the difference between the "Real Rocket Velocity vs. % Used Mass" graph and the "Rocket Velocity vs. Used Mass" graph. I'm a little confused on why you are presenting both of them if they both show the same thing, so if you could shed some light on the difference between the two that would be awesome and easier to understand. Other than that, awesome work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The first graph is plotting the "rocket" function numerical solutions to compare to the literal governing tsiolkovsky equation. The second graph is plotting the num. solutions of both the rocket and simplerocket functions, i just made these separate graphs because there was a separate question asking to compare the functions. But since the simple rocket solution returns the same data as the tsiolkovsky equation the graphs look the same. I know this is redundant but I just tried to be thorough.
Beautiful code, however the only concern that I have is the difference between the "Real Rocket Velocity vs. % Used Mass" graph and the "Rocket Velocity vs. Used Mass" graph. I'm a little confused on why you are presenting both of them if they both show the same thing, so if you could shed some light on the difference between the two that would be awesome and easier to understand. Other than that, awesome work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: