diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index f1d3a04..1557c5c 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -47,18 +47,6 @@ No measurement is exact. No surface is compeletely flat. Every measurement you
 make has two types of uncertainties, systematic and random. Systematic
 uncertainties come from faults in your assumptions or equipment. 
 
-### Lab #1 - Measurements of machining precision and accuracy
-
-**Outline and figures at beginning of following lab**
-
-All measurements have traceable standards. There are seven base units in SI -               
-meter (length), second (time), Mole (amount of substance), Ampere (electric                 
-current), Kelvin (temperature), Candela (Luminous intensity), and kilogram                  
-(mass) [1](https://www.nist.gov/pml/weights-and-measures/metric-si/si-units).               
-Any measurement you make should have some method to check against a reference.              
-In this lab, we will use calipers that measure dimensions i.e.  meter\*10$^{-3}$            
-(length). Calipers can always be verified to work with gage blocks.
-
 ### Lab #0 - Introduction to the Student t-test
 
 **Outline and figures due Wed 9/5 by 5pm**
@@ -79,7 +67,3 @@ model. Here are some examples for caliper measurements:
 In theory, all uncertainies could be accounted for by factoring in all physics
 in your readings. In reality, there is a diminishing return on investment
 for this practice. So we use some statistical insights to draw conclusions. 
-
-
-
-