index.html

<!doctype html>
<html class="no-js" lang="">
    <head>
        <meta charset="utf-8">
        <meta http-equiv="x-ua-compatible" content="ie=edge">
        <title></title>
        <meta name="description" content="">
        <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

        <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="apple-touch-icon.png">
        <!-- Place favicon.ico in the root directory -->

        <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/normalize.css">
        <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/main.css">
        <script src="js/vendor/modernizr-2.8.3.min.js"></script>
    </head>
    <body>
        <!--[if lt IE 8]>
            <p class="browserupgrade">You are using an <strong>outdated</strong> browser. Please <a href="http://browsehappy.com/">upgrade your browser</a> to improve your experience.</p>
        <![endif]-->

        <!-- Add your site or application content here -->
 <div class="container">
<div class="top">
  <h1> Elections 101</h1>
  <h3>Get your scoop of Elections and Bullshit here </h3>
</div>

<div class="body">

<div class="Hillary">
<img src="img/Hillary.jpg" alt="Hillary" style="width:300px;height:169px;">
  <h2>HILLARY</h2>
  <h3>Join the official campaign—and help stop Donald Trump!</h3>
  <p>The crown prince of Bahrain gives millions of dollars to a charitable organization that works with the family foundation of the secretary of state. Later, he asks for a meeting with the secretary of state, through both formal and informal channels. He gets it.<p>

<p>Is this proof of illegal influence peddling, or just how the intermingling worlds of politics and philanthropy work? And at what point does the difference between an apparent conflict of interest and an actual conflict cease to matter?</p>
</div>

<div class="Trump">
<img src="img/trump.jpg" alt="Trump" style="width:300px;height:214px;">
  <h2>TRUMP</h2>
  <h3>Make America Great Again!</h3>
  <p>At first, it looks like the same old act. What could be more natural than a coiffed and bellicose Donald Trump, addressing a raucous crowd on a Friday afternoon in Manchester, New Hampshire, that great white-frustration campaign Mecca he blew through like a hurricane nine months ago during primary season? </p>
</div>

<div class="Random">
<div class="Randomimg">
<img src="img/beyonce.jpg" alt="beyonce" style="width:300px;height:231px;">
</div>
<div class="RandomP">
  <h2>BEYONCE</h2>
  <h3>Because why not</h3>
  <p>A year before the next president takes office, voters are skeptical that any of the leading 2016 candidates would make a good president. Moreover, of nine candidates included in the survey, far more voters say each would make a “terrible” than “great” president.

The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center, conducted Jan. 7-14 among 2,009 adults, including 1,525 registered voters, finds that 35% of voters say that Hillary Clinton would make either a good or great president, with 11% saying she would be great. More voters (44%) say Clinton would be either poor or terrible in the White House; 28% say she would be terrible. About one-in-five (18%) think Clinton would make an average president.</p>
</div>
</div>

</div>
</div>

</body>

        <script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.0.min.js"></script>
        <script>window.jQuery || document.write('<script src="js/vendor/jquery-1.12.0.min.js"><\/script>')</script>
        <script src="js/plugins.js"></script>
        <script src="js/main.js"></script>

        <!-- Google Analytics: change UA-XXXXX-X to be your site's ID. -->
        <script>
            (function(b,o,i,l,e,r){b.GoogleAnalyticsObject=l;b[l]||(b[l]=
            function(){(b[l].q=b[l].q||[]).push(arguments)});b[l].l=+new Date;
            e=o.createElement(i);r=o.getElementsByTagName(i)[0];
            e.src='https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js';
            r.parentNode.insertBefore(e,r)}(window,document,'script','ga'));
            ga('create','UA-XXXXX-X','auto');ga('send','pageview');
        </script>
    </body>
</html>
	<!doctype html>
	<html class="no-js" lang="">
	<head>
	<meta charset="utf-8">
	<meta http-equiv="x-ua-compatible" content="ie=edge">
	<title></title>
	<meta name="description" content="">
	<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

	<link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="apple-touch-icon.png">
	<!-- Place favicon.ico in the root directory -->

	<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/normalize.css">
	<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/main.css">
	<script src="js/vendor/modernizr-2.8.3.min.js"></script>
	</head>
	<body>
	<!--[if lt IE 8]>
	<p class="browserupgrade">You are using an <strong>outdated</strong> browser. Please <a href="http://browsehappy.com/">upgrade your browser</a> to improve your experience.</p>
	<![endif]-->

	<!-- Add your site or application content here -->
	<div class="container">
	<div class="top">
	<h1> Elections 101</h1>
	<h3>Get your scoop of Elections and Bullshit here </h3>
	</div>

	<div class="body">

	<div class="Hillary">
	<img src="img/Hillary.jpg" alt="Hillary" style="width:300px;height:169px;">
	<h2>HILLARY</h2>
	<h3>Join the official campaign—and help stop Donald Trump!</h3>
	<p>The crown prince of Bahrain gives millions of dollars to a charitable organization that works with the family foundation of the secretary of state. Later, he asks for a meeting with the secretary of state, through both formal and informal channels. He gets it.<p>

	<p>Is this proof of illegal influence peddling, or just how the intermingling worlds of politics and philanthropy work? And at what point does the difference between an apparent conflict of interest and an actual conflict cease to matter?</p>
	</div>

	<div class="Trump">
	<img src="img/trump.jpg" alt="Trump" style="width:300px;height:214px;">
	<h2>TRUMP</h2>
	<h3>Make America Great Again!</h3>
	<p>At first, it looks like the same old act. What could be more natural than a coiffed and bellicose Donald Trump, addressing a raucous crowd on a Friday afternoon in Manchester, New Hampshire, that great white-frustration campaign Mecca he blew through like a hurricane nine months ago during primary season? </p>
	</div>

	<div class="Random">
	<div class="Randomimg">
	<img src="img/beyonce.jpg" alt="beyonce" style="width:300px;height:231px;">
	</div>
	<div class="RandomP">
	<h2>BEYONCE</h2>
	<h3>Because why not</h3>
	<p>A year before the next president takes office, voters are skeptical that any of the leading 2016 candidates would make a good president. Moreover, of nine candidates included in the survey, far more voters say each would make a “terrible” than “great” president.

	The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center, conducted Jan. 7-14 among 2,009 adults, including 1,525 registered voters, finds that 35% of voters say that Hillary Clinton would make either a good or great president, with 11% saying she would be great. More voters (44%) say Clinton would be either poor or terrible in the White House; 28% say she would be terrible. About one-in-five (18%) think Clinton would make an average president.</p>
	</div>
	</div>

	</div>
	</div>

	</body>

	<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.0.min.js"></script>
	<script>window.jQuery \|\| document.write('<script src="js/vendor/jquery-1.12.0.min.js"><\/script>')</script>
	<script src="js/plugins.js"></script>
	<script src="js/main.js"></script>

	<!-- Google Analytics: change UA-XXXXX-X to be your site's ID. -->
	<script>
	(function(b,o,i,l,e,r){b.GoogleAnalyticsObject=l;b[l]\|\|(b[l]=
	function(){(b[l].q=b[l].q\|\|[]).push(arguments)});b[l].l=+new Date;
	e=o.createElement(i);r=o.getElementsByTagName(i)[0];
	e.src='https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js';
	r.parentNode.insertBefore(e,r)}(window,document,'script','ga'));
	ga('create','UA-XXXXX-X','auto');ga('send','pageview');
	</script>
	</body>
	</html>