Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
result of table of contents discussion
  • Loading branch information
theresesmith committed Sep 16, 2015
1 parent 799dc65 commit f3d8854
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 10 changed files with 3,909 additions and 3,074 deletions.
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion ch1.tex
Expand Up @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ This is a qualitative study.\\
Its analytic lens is phenomenography.\\
The research question is what are the conceptions of proof we find in the population of students of computer science (and engineering).

\section{Qualitative Research}

\begin{quote}
Black and Williams 1998 stated ``When instructors understand what students know and how they think --- and the use that knowledge to make more effective instructional decisions --- significant increases in student learning occur'' \cite{black1998inside}%Black, Paul and Dylan William, Inside the Black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment Granada Learning 1998
\end{quote}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ proof techniques: induction, construction, contradiction?

\end{itemize}


\section{{Research Questions}}

These questions are interesting because with the curriculum we are trying to
build capabilities into the students, that will enable them to tackle various
Expand All @@ -105,6 +107,10 @@ is thought to be particularly helpful in deepening student understanding.
Thus the relevance of this research to the curriculum is that the work will
generate suggestions about points to emphasize.

\section{Phenomenography for these Research Questions}

\section{Overview}

Chapter 2 discusses the design of the research study. Chapter 3 discusses the
phenomenographic research perspective, and the epistemological framework.
Chapter 4 discusses the methodologies applied in the several studies, including
Expand Down
305 changes: 211 additions & 94 deletions ch2.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

667 changes: 455 additions & 212 deletions ch3.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

544 changes: 355 additions & 189 deletions ch4.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

1,167 changes: 1,137 additions & 30 deletions ch5.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

363 changes: 228 additions & 135 deletions ch6.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

2,163 changes: 1,140 additions & 1,023 deletions ch7.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

352 changes: 124 additions & 228 deletions ch8.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

1,394 changes: 242 additions & 1,152 deletions ch9.tex

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

20 changes: 10 additions & 10 deletions thesis2.tex
Expand Up @@ -38,16 +38,16 @@ Connecticut, USA, 2014}

%%%---- Input content ----%%%
\input{ch1.tex} %intro
\input{ch2.tex} %design of the study
\input{ch3.tex} %research perspective and epistemological framework
\input{ch4.tex} %methodology
\input{ch5.tex} %data
\input{ch6.tex} %data analysis and interpretation
\input{ch7.tex} %what got produced by analysis
\input{ch8.tex} %validity and reliability
\input{ch9.tex} %related work
\input{ch10.tex} %conclus
\input{ch11.tex} %future work
\input{ch2.tex} %research perspective and epistemological framework
\input{ch3.tex} %methodology including analysis
\input{ch4.tex} %results
\input{ch5.tex} %interpretation/discussion
\input{ch6.tex} %validity and reliability
\input{ch7.tex} %related work
\input{ch8.tex} %conclusions
\input{ch9.tex} %future work
%\input{ch10.tex} %
%\input{ch11.tex} %
%\input{TODOs.tex}
%... etc.
%%%-----------------------%%%
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f3d8854

Please sign in to comment.